|
|
Post by Chiefs GM (Josh) on Jul 3, 2020 8:40:19 GMT -7
KC Sends
1.14
DEN Sends
Noah Fant 2023-5mil
Devin Singletary 2023-3mil
Too much value to pass on for me. 2 great contracts on some young talent! We accept. Thanks Shelton for the easy talks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2020 9:07:30 GMT -7
I Accept the trade
|
|
|
|
Post by Dolphins GM (Frank) on Jul 3, 2020 9:08:49 GMT -7
Interesting trade
APPROVE 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Patriots GM (Bushma) on Jul 3, 2020 9:15:32 GMT -7
Approve 2
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2020 9:37:38 GMT -7
approve 3-0
|
|
|
|
Post by Patriots GM (Bushma) on Jul 3, 2020 9:38:59 GMT -7
Processed
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Spengford) on Jul 3, 2020 9:45:54 GMT -7
Oh dear ...that was a disaster
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Spengford) on Jul 3, 2020 10:16:12 GMT -7
KC Sends 1.14 DEN Sends Noah Fant 2023-5mil Devin Singletary 2023-3mil Too much value to pass on for me. 2 great contracts on some young talent! We accept. Thanks Shelton for the easy talks. Well played, Singletary is basically a freebie and he's a very good running back. You snuck one past TAB... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 3, 2020 11:57:19 GMT -7
Approve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2020 13:10:15 GMT -7
Bringing my comment here back to the trade thread so don't lose track of where the original post went.
Not sure what or if anything can be done about this trade as of now. In the future with scenarios like this where votes quickly went through. I don't have a problem with the commissioner having power to still reverse a deal like this in a reasonable time frame. Having said that with this trade I'd feel it's too late for that considering Denver has been making other trades for his franchise and was a on the clock pick.
Mostly saying in the future when something like this comes about, especially during draft. Maybe we pause the draft for a few to get the trade scenario cleaned up for both rosters. Hard for me to say that considering I'm the guy who wants to speed through the draft so can get my picks in but figured is better we do that so don't end up giving a rebuild package in future. Giving the commissioner power to step in on certain scenarios and deals where things can be fixed would be fine with me as well.
Anyways just wanted to throw my two cents in. As a tab member I'll try doing a better job of analyzing trades for the health of each roster but ain't always easy. Thanks for your time in reading my comments.
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Spengford) on Jul 5, 2020 13:28:18 GMT -7
Bringing my comment here back to the trade thread so don't lose track of where the original post went. Not sure what or if anything can be done about this trade as of now. In the future with scenarios like this where votes quickly went through. I don't have a problem with the commissioner having power to still reverse a deal like this in a reasonable time frame. Having said that with this trade I'd feel it's too late for that considering Denver has been making other trades for his franchise and was a on the clock pick. Mostly saying in the future when something like this comes about, especially during draft. Maybe we pause the draft for a few to get the trade scenario cleaned up for both rosters. Hard for me to say that considering I'm the guy who wants to speed through the draft so can get my picks in but figured is better we do that so don't end up giving a rebuild package in future. Giving the commissioner power to step in on certain scenarios and deals where things can be fixed would be fine with me as well. Anyways just wanted to throw my two cents in. As a tab member I'll try doing a better job of analyzing trades for the health of each roster but ain't always easy. Thanks for your time in reading my comments. I'm wondering if TAB just looked to see it was an OTC trade and didn't really analyse what was being given up. As I said on the other Denver trade thread this is basically the 1.11 and 1.26 for the 1.14, which can be justifiable if they were both massive busts, but Fant played very well, for a rookie TE (They tend to take 2/3 years no matter how good or well they get drafted) and Singletary had a very good first season with expected power to add, he also a PPR asset here. Full season we should be expecting a minimum 1000 yards. The pick itself makes it look a lot worse. No one here would pass two firsts for a corner let alone two proven and young assets on long contracts. I'd have given up a mid first for Singletary and probably the same for Fant..I'd expect to be knocked back on the Fant one without a sweetner thrown in. But that's not a discussion for here and it's a learning moment for Denver...(I have a big board here out which I know is my opinion but it's not that far off ADP especially early on. If that helps anyone out who may not have had time to work out players into the 60's plus. MFL ADP isnot working for IDP and the rankings aren't too good) I think this was a speed thing for TAB here, trying to keep the draft moving which was admirable and I know we can't dictate or veto a pick (though sometimes I'd like to.) I'm not wishing to blame or criticize them. I think maybe they overthought the Wagner deal though because of it. It probably goes through if I make it and not Denver. Also would like to make it clear I attach no blame to the Denver GM who I'm assuming is fairly new to this type of league (I do recall when I first played these 32 team full IDP, wondering which positions carry higher values, think I once gave up a touch too much for a corner) |
|
